Big Headache for Big Pharma
by Will Hall, originally at Adbusters Magazine
Eli Lilly CEO Sydney Taurel received a 5-year $37-million compensation
package for heading a company whose ethical standards are
indistinguishable from those of a common criminal.
For pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly, death and injury are just a cost of doing
business. When Zyprexa, Lilly’s drug to treat schizophrenia and bipolar
disorder, hit the marketplace in 1996, it was hailed as an “atypical” – a “safe, gentle psychotropic,” more effective than older drugs like Thorazine
and Trilafon, without the dangerous side effects. Sales skyrocketed. The
hype soon gave way to reality, as Lilly faced waves of lawsuits by patients
suffering from diabetes, massive weight gain, pancreatitis and cardiac
problems. Lilly responded with the cozy arrangement that worked with
Prozac, another blockbuster plagued with problems: quietly settle suits out
of court, with proceedings sealed and secret under a gag order. Anything
embarrassing – or illegal – that Lilly is doing behind closed doors would
remain hidden from public view.
Even though the payout is enormous – more than a billion dollars in
settlements to tens of thousands of plaintiffs – Lilly can afford it: atypicals
sell for ten times more than older drugs, and Lilly’s marketing machine
made Zyprexa its biggest profit maker, with more than 20 million
customers worldwide and sales topping $4 billion annually. So Lilly writes
a check, buys the silence of the people harmed by its products, and then
turns around and passes the cost along to the consumer at inflated
drugstore prices. All perfectly legal.
What Lilly didn’t count on was a whistleblower, a lawyer and hackers
taking matters into their own hands. Just as Lilly’s legal muscle was lax
during Christmas holidays, one of the expert witnesses in the Zyprexa
litigation contacted human rights attorney Jim Gottstein, who used a
combination of clever subpoena wizardry and fast action to get hundreds
of secret documents out from under the court seal. Gottstein turned the
memos over to The New York Times before Lilly could plug the leak. The
memos, emails and correspondence reveal how Lilly’s marketing strategy
bent and broke the law, hid unfavorable risk studies and pushed Zyprexa
for unapproved use on the elderly and children. The Times ran repeated
front page stories, and Lilly’s stock took a nose dive.
Claiming “trade secrets” and proprietary “merchandising techniques,” Lilly
lawyers swooped down on Gottstein, seizing emails and voice mail
records. They convinced the court to order an injunction forbidding further
distribution of the files, but Gottstein had already sent out disks loaded with scanned copies to a dozen activists and journalists around the country.
Lilly tracked the disks down, trying to halt the escalating crisis.
And this is where the hackers come in. Someone – still not identified by
Lilly – got a copy, but any distribution traced back to them could lead to
contempt of court and serious legal consequences. So they turned to
software called Tor, set up by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Tor is an
anonymous server privacy tool EFF created to help dissidents in
totalitarian regimes like China slip past state censors. It was perfect to help
the whistle-blowers evade Lilly’s surveillance. The file – zyprexakills.tar.gz – found its way into cyberspace, and the court finally ruled that Lilly
couldn’t block websites from hosting the file once it was freely available
online. The leak finally went public.
The Zyprexa documents are a disturbing glimpse into the marketing mind
of one of the biggest companies in the world, a firm with close ties to the
Bush Administration (Lilly CEO Sidney Taurel sits on the Homeland
Security Council). When a study showed three times the risk of diabetes
over other drugs, Lilly simply hid it from the Food and Drug
Administration’s scrutiny. Lilly aimed sales to dementia patients – without
approval – in a campaign called “Viva Zyprexa.” They instructed product
representatives to downplay drug risks, and targeted children, who
Zyprexa has never been tested on. Emails discussed the strategy of
indemnifying doctors who prescribe Zyprexa against any legal action: “Our
experience with Prozac,” the memo said, “confirms the impact and
goodwill of such an initiative.” The memos reveal callous indifference to
the diabetes risk Zyprexa causes, perhaps because Lilly’s other top selling
drugs include – you guessed it – diabetes medications.
Lilly now faces a snowballing scandal. The Times compared Zyprexa to
Vioxx, Merck’s painkiller withdrawn from the market after leaked
documents showed the company hid heart attack risks. FDA scientist Dr.
David Graham, who blew the whistle on Vioxx, testified to Congress that
atypicals like Zyprexa kill some 62,000 people a year in unapproved uses.
A study in the Archives of General Psychiatry concluded atypicals were no
more effective than older, cheaper drugs, and five state governments, with
enormous budgets for atypicals, initiated investigations. And last month,
four-year-old Rebecca Riley died from drugs prescribed by a psychiatrist,
including an atypical, raising concerns about the approximately 30,000
children under five who take these drugs, despite no study on drug safety
for children.
Lilly objected to its secret memos going public because they might “cause
unwarranted fear among patients that will cause them to stop taking their
medication.” Yet this gets to the heart of Lilly’s corruption. Beyond hiding
drug risks and marketing illegally, Big Pharma doesn’t trust its customers
to make informed decisions about their health care. Growing numbers of
people are turning off the TV pill ads and exploring other ways to deal with
their suffering. A New York Times article last year broke the story of the
many people with a schizophrenia diagnosis who do well with non-
medication treatments. Maybe the solution isn’t to be found in a pill after
all?
Now that would bring down Big Pharma faster than any scandal.
Will Hall is co-founder of the Freedom Center, and is a member of the
Icarus Project.
|