http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-greene7nov07,0,4172584.story?coll=la-opinion-center
From the Los Angeles Times
BLOWBACK
Animals think they’re pretty smart
Animal Liberation spokeswoman takes a bite out of UCLA animal testing.
By Lindy Greene
November 7, 2007
The North American Animal Liberation Press Office is a legal,
above-ground organization that receives, clarifies and releases to the
media the anonymous communiques received by underground activists who
carry out illegal direct actions in defense of animals exploited and
abused by individual and industry profiteers. The NAALPO is unaware of
the identities of these activists and cannot predict or control when,
where, how or whether they will strike. One might say that we speak for
those who cannot — and for those who dare not.
Vivisection is simultaneously an animal rights and a human rights
issue. Contrary to Edythe London's claim in her recent Op-Ed article "
Why I use laboratory animals,"
testing treatments on animals and applying the results to humans is the
greatest confounding variable of all! Data from one species cannot be
extrapolated to another with more than 5% to 25% accuracy (note that
simply flipping a coin would yield 50%) and that explains why no cures
come down the pike for decades. It underlies the multiple thousands of
consumer injuries and deaths every year from adverse reactions to drugs
tested "safe" in animals and, conversely, causes potentially beneficial
drugs tested "unsafe" to be discarded. Vivisection accomplishes nothing
more than to gratuitously torture animals and retard true advancement
in human medicine. In sum, it is both immoral and scientifically
fraudulent.
UCLA squanders hundreds of millions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars to
turn monkeys into tweakers while drug rehabilitation centers founder
for lack of funds. Addiction is an area of inquiry that should lend
itself admirably to human clinical studies. To understand substance
abuse, investigators must examine and address the psychological,
sociological, economic, political and other demographic parameters
underlying a uniquely human inclination. Animals in the wild do not
volitionally intoxicate themselves with psychotropic chemicals — and
those in labs forced into artificially-induced dependence cannot
communicate their experiences. Imagine the benefit to society by
intervening through education and counseling before the prospective
addict makes the fateful decision to try a drug. Some of the millions
awarded to UCLA to hook primates might be redirected toward those more
laudable endeavors.
While I have no love for the tobacco industry, I have to point out that
smoking is completely elective. We have known for years that smoking
induces chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and lung cancer, yet we
are unwilling to accept personal accountability for conditions that are
unequivocally the result of our own unwise behavior. Cardiovascular
disease, cancer and stroke are all on the rise. While a certain
percentage may be due to heritable factors, much, if not most, is
undoubtedly the consequence of eating animals. Our dentition, salivary
and stomach acid composition and intestinal anatomy were designed for
the ingestion of plants. Our air, water and soil are saturated with
contaminants, yet the vivisectionists continue to hoodwink the gullible
public into believing that we have to torture animals to find cures for
ailments that can be mitigated or averted with more appropriate
lifestyle choices and better environmental stewardship.
As a Jew, I cannot comprehend how someone who claims to be the child of
Holocaust survivors can participate in a holocaust against other
sentient beings. With London's reported background in psychiatry, she
should be fully cognizant that animal abuse is the hallmark symptom of
psychopathology.
History strives repeatedly to teach us lessons that we stubbornly
refuse to learn. In order to achieve its objectives, every social
justice movement has ultimately had to resort to violence against the
oppressors or their property. When legitimate grievances go
consistently unheard, the attendant frustration expresses itself with
escalating vehemence. The Sons of Liberty tossed 300 chests of British
tea into the Boston harbor. The suffragettes employed arson. It took a
civil war to end slavery and a world war to dismantle the Nazi
concentration camps.
The Animal Liberation Front adheres to a nonnegotiable policy that no
life, human or animal, be harmed during an action. It seeks to liberate
animals directly from the clutches of their abusers or engage in
economic sabotage against those abusers. The purpose of the former is
self-explanatory; the motivation for the latter is the unfortunate
recognition that it is the only means to engage with those whose
cognitive and empathic shortfalls render them otherwise unreachable.
Activists who risk life, limb and liberty to stand up for sentient
beings who cannot speak or act in their own behalf are unsung heroes
and must endure the barbs of others who lack courage and moral
fortitude. But they know the animals have it much worse, and that
realization impels them to continue the battle for creatures whom
society would arbitrarily place outside the circle of moral compassion
and beyond the reach of effective defense.
Lindy Greene is the North American Animal Liberation press officer.