- Other editions:
- Mobile |
- News Feeds (RSS) |
- E-mail Newsletters |
- Print Edition
- Find it:
- Jobs |
- Cars |
- Real Estate |
- Rentals |
- Shopping |
- Classifieds
|
![]() |
News
Feds investigate mink release at Jefferson farmAnimal Liberation Front claims credit and issues a threat; all animals are recapturedApril 24, 2008
Federal authorities were investigating the attempted release of about 50 mink by members of the Animal Liberation Front from a Jefferson farm, officials said. ![]() FBI agents spent Wednesday morning gathering evidence at the Jefferson Fur Farm, agency spokeswoman Beth Ann Steele said. The released mink were discovered about 6 a.m. Monday, Steele said. Farmworkers caught them all before they could get away. "Guard dogs started barking right away, and the owners woke up and were able to recover the mink," Steele said. A press release placed online Tuesday by the Animal Liberation Front contained an apparent threat against the farm's owners. It was signed by ALF-Cascadia. "Consider this your first warning," it read. "Tear down this death camp and let the mink live free. If you don't, we will be back to finish the job." The ALF is considered a domestic terrorist group by the U.S. Department of Justice, and its threats are taken seriously, Steele said. The group's press release referred to them as "masked avengers" and acknowledged that some of the freed animals likely would not survive their release. "It will be a hard road ahead for these mink and their offspring, but with our help, they now have a chance at survival," the release read. "Even if some of the mink do not make it, we feel is it better to die free than at the hands of their speciesist captors." The Marion County Sheriff's Office is assisting in the investigation. The perpetrators destroyed breeding records, said Teresa Platt, the executive director of Fur Commission USA. Platt's Coronado, Calif.-based association represents mink farmers in 28 states and keeps track of ecoterrorist incidents. Platt estimated the loss of the records was $5,000. "Everybody in Oregon and agriculture has probably gone on alert because of this," Platt said. rliao@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 589-6941 In your voiceRead reactions to this story
SN00PY wrote:
Because
when you shear a sheep you are not taking it's skin, which is necessary
for life. Fox, rabbit or racoon fur, snake , eel or alligator skin,
cowhides and most everything else...when humans take it for a product
the animal is killed. Only a relatively few things get sheared. (sheep,
goats, llamas, alpacas).
4/25/2008 6:20:35 AM
lojol wrote:
I
don't know much about mink, but how is skinning mink any different than
shearing sheep? As far as I know, mink aren't killed in the process and
can grow a several coats for skinning during their lifespan. Sheep have
been domesticated since the Bronze Age and we can also eat them. Other
than that, don't see much of a difference. Oh, mink are much more cuter
than sheep.
4/24/2008 7:31:29 PM
youngwarrior wrote:
Mink
are not rodents; they are weasels. That said I agree with LegalOne.
There is no difference in raising mink for fur and raising cattle for
leather and meat.
4/24/2008 11:10:19 AM
SN00PY wrote:
Ethically speaking, I don't see mink coats falling too far from the leather coats which many of us own.
As far as ALF's actions, it is as simple as "two wrongs don't make a right". 4/24/2008 10:51:31 AM
soapbox55 wrote:
Mink
would never be in the attic. I would never want them killed, just
removed. I hated having to kill the rats and mice in my attic. Every
living thing has a place in the world. Most just don't belong in the
house or attic.
4/24/2008 10:26:32 AM
JennyDonati wrote:
They're RODENTS.
If they were in the attic, any of you would be the first to call Terminix. 4/24/2008 10:11:52 AM
rosterma wrote:
A
mink coat is just a status symbol of the elite, a way to separate
themselves from the lower classes. Where there's money there will
always by people that will flaunt it with their jewelry and furs. I
don't agree with ALF's tactics to stop animal cruelty, but I don't
agree with the inhumane treatment of any animal, and there is no law
against raising animals for fur, so for me, as with a lot of people, it
is still a quandary.
4/24/2008 8:16:45 AM
LegalOne wrote:
Raising
mink in farms is just like raising any other farm animal. We don't hear
the outcry about cows, pigs, chickens etc. The only difference is these
animals are raised for their fur, not their meat. Their meat is
recycled back to feed them. I don't see anything wrong this type of
farming.
4/24/2008 8:09:48 AM
soapbox55 wrote:
Justification
for wearing mink can not be made in the lower United States. Maybe
parts of Alaska, Russia, and the North Pole, but not down here.
Setting them "free" was also a very cruel thing to do. They may still have enough "wild instincts" left in them to survive, but it is still cruel. Probably as cruel as skinning them for their coats for vain humans to wear. 4/24/2008 7:04:53 AM |




















